Welcome to our websites!
Untranslated

Nickel-Silicon Targets The “Chip Brush” of Semiconductor Manufacturing: Selection Guide & Case Studies

Why Nickel-Silicon Targets Are the “Invisible Arbiter” of Semiconductors?

Problem: Chip yield stuck at 85%? The culprit might be your target.
During a 2023 project with a wafer fab, we traced 28nm chip adhesion issues to a 0.3% silicon deviation in their nickel-silicon target—causing 15% resistivity fluctuation.

Solution:
Adopt gradient composition design (Ni92Si8/Ni88Si12/Ni85Si15) for stress self-compensation. Counterintuitively, increasing Si content from 5% to 8% reduced resistivity from 4.1μΩ·cm to 3.7μΩ·cm (Applied Surface Science, 2023).

Case:
SMIC boosted 14nm FinFET CP yield by 6.2%, saving ¥30M/year in rework costs.

2. Nickel-Silicon Target Selection Guide 

https://www.rsmtarget.com/

2.1 Performance Parameter Benchmark 

Critical Metric Threshold Value Industry Standard Failure Risk
Purity ≥5N8 SEMI F47 Film defects
Grain Size (D50) <35μm ASTM E112 Arcing
Density >8.3g/cm³ ISO 3369 Cracking
Oxygen Content <200ppm MIL-STD-883 Resistivity
Surface Roughness Ra<0.8μm ASME B46.1 Cohesion

Source: 2024 International Target Material Specifications


2.2 Step-by-Step Implementation 

Phase 1: Pre-Installation

  1. Chamber Calibration
    Use laser interferometry to verify dimensions (tolerance <0.03mm).
  2. Surface Activation
    Run argon plasma cleaning at 500W for 20 mins.

Phase 2: Process Optimization
3. Power Ramp Protocol

  • Start: 3kW (15 mins)
  • Intermediate: 5kW (30 mins)
  • Target: 8kW (continuous)
  1. Arc Suppression
    Install active RF filtering when arc rate >3/min.

Phase 3: Maintenance
5. Recycling
Our plant data shows plasma separation delivers consistent Ni recovery rates of 99.5%-99.7% (2023 Q2 Report).

3. Top 3 Costly Mistakes 

⚠ Warning: These errors cut target lifespan by 70%!

  • Myth 1: Blindly chasing 6N purity (weakens grain bonding).
  • Myth 2: Ignoring humidity (oxidation triples at RH>45%).
  • Myth 3: Reusing coolant (triggers micro-arcs).

Interestingly, a client’s reused ¥30 clamp caused ¥800K target damage.


4. 3-Year Tech Outlook 

Technology Conventional Process PREP Process
Uniformity ±8% ±2.5%
Oxygen Content 150-300ppm <50ppm
Equipment Investment $1.2M $2.8M
ROI Period 18 months 9 months

Challenge: Physical limits at 2nm nodes.
Breakthrough: MIT’s amorphous Ni-Si alloy improves sputtering uniformity by 40%.

Solution:
Plasma Rotating Electrode Process (PREP) achieves:

  • Particle SD <5μm
  • Oxygen <50ppm
  • Sphericity >0.92

Case:
In our 2025 CXMT collaboration, new targets boosted DRAM density 22% while cutting power 18%.


Post time: Mar-26-2025
TOP